Disregard what I wrote about Twitter a week ago — new review to come. No time at the moment though as I am too busy using it to get links.
New Twitter-length appraisal of Twitter: Use it to find #likeminds and the latest info from #alternativesources and sorry out of spaceRECENTLY ENJOYEDGAZA, IN PARTICULAR
Source — Flickr collection of Cuba Gallery, New Zealand, which has some very bewitching digitally enhanced, or softened, photos
Artist calls himself Fingers Scintilla and is inspired or influenced by Second Life.
(holding space here for your contribution, Cloggo)
Abandoned power plant — from a good archive of urbex photos, www.urban-travel.org
What do you use the 'Page' option for in Tumblr?
I have been messing with templates for the first time in a while and it’s obvious I haven’t been keeping up …
If anyone can forward me examples of how Pages are used, I’d be grateful. Do they get indexed to our home page, and might they be used for a longer post we want to keep handy; or can they link to other websites altogether?
Where I spend my time: 1 Facebook, 2 Google Reader, 3 Flickr
Since so many of us, Stumblers and Tumblers, these days find ourselves trying to juggle a range of social networks, I thought I’d write a summary of what I use most, and what appeals about each one. I’ve included Google Reader as well, as it is central to prioritising what lobs in.
In order of time spent:Facebook, because of
1 discussions — someone posts a comment, question or link to their wall and their friends chime in quickly and easily with responses
2 news from sources you trust — via friends and pages you subscribe to
3 it’s fast!
1 It’s the fastest way to read from a lot of blogs, news sources and any site with RSS options
2 You can click links on any item in your list to go to the source that supplied it (a blog, news site or whatever)
3 You can view what has lobbed in list or detailed form (the latter presents the full item, with pictures)
4 There are options to arrange subscriptions in folders, by topic etc; I depend on them
Flickr, because of
1 The ability to create personal galleries from others’ photos has given a new appeal to me
2 The search engine is excellent, with a range of options for context searching within names, groups, locations etc
3 I subscribe to dozens of group pools which feature photos by theme, and find a lot of good photographers that way
1 It has a huge range of free template designs, and new ones are always being added
2 It is the best choice for visual blogging, as posting is easy and the display can be very impressive
3 There is no sense of policing and yet it is also virtually spam-free
Stumbleupon
1 It’s the fastest method of sharing websites with friends
2 It’s easy to keep in touch with SU friends via toolbar messages
3 Good tagging allows you to find your bookmarked sites and pages again
And SU Mk 4 encourages people to simply thumb sites up rather than stop and examine them, and God forbid, review them.
The latest revamp was unfathomably stupid unless they simply want to collect data and/or work with the money-for-clicks crowd and generate revenue there.
Delicious
1 A sophisticated tool for managing and finding bookmarked sites
2 Its search engine allows fine-tuning in context, date periods, networks etc if you’re using it as a general database.
3 It simply does its job, does it well, and is used mostly without ulterior motives, so you get quality links
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ With apologies to those who continue to despise Facebook, friends I visit less frequently though I may still read (thanks to RSS) and people who are sick of the pics I post on here these days.
@StephenFry #Love you but I still #hate #Twitter
Why?
~ It is unsatisfactory to read because of both the brevity (ref the 140-character limit to each posting) and the disfigured English and codes that are part of its conventions to include URLs and tags
~ It is used mostly for self-promotion, and much of the traffic is automated — ie forwarded from somewhere else rather than written specifically for Twitter
~ The sheer quantity of postings plus the inane nature of most of them equals a junk diet
no buts except on the odd occasion where it’s been used from a phone in a life or death situation; and the constant presence of Stephen Fry. Maybe the only thing I don’t “get” about Fry is his championing of Twitter, and how or why he keeps it up. It’s not as though he needs the fans.
Emil Nolde —Flowers, 1934 (from amare-habeo)
Michael Kutsche designed the characters for Tim Burton’s Alice In Wonderland, and in the process turned Alan Rickman into this obnoxious creature (perfectly in keeping with both L. Carroll and some of Rickman’s previous roles, notably Snape).
Click this pic for Kutsche’s own site and hereto keep tabs on”creature art” in general.



